Answering the Heretic
Chapter 2, Mishna 19
By Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld
"Rabbi Elazar said: Be diligent in the study of Torah. Know what to answer
a heretic. Know before Whom you toil. And faithful is your Employer that He
will pay you the reward for your labor."
We are continuing to study the teachings of the five primary students of R.
Yochanan ben Zakkai (Mishna 10). This mishna presents the words of R.
Elazar, R. Yochanan's fifth and final student.
R. Elazar advises us to be prepared to answer all challenges put forth by
heretics. We must anticipate their arguments and be ready with proper and
appropriate responses. We must know how the other side is translating (and
often mistranslating) verses and what those verses truly mean. (Don't allow
them to turn "a son has been born to us" (written many hundreds of years
before the Common Era) into "a son will be born." And certainly don't let
them tell you "maiden" means "virgin.") This shouldn't be difficult: we
have the original Hebrew and all the ancient commentaries on our side.
Truth really does speak for itself. Nevertheless, as we know, getting
others to buy truth is 10% content and 90% packaging. We must not only
know what to answer. We must well know how to say it.
The term our mishna uses for heretic is "apikorus." This is the Hebrew
equivalent of Epicurus, the Ancient Greek philosopher (3rd-2nd Centuries
B.C.E.), founder of the Epicurean philosophy ("Eat, drink, and be merry for
tomorrow we may die" -- especially with eating habits like that). (The
Epicureans were actually more "rational hedonists," but for our purposes,
the folk-simplification is sufficient -- and also telling.) The term
apikorus in Jewish literature has become synonymous with one who adheres to
any doctrine contrary to the basic tenets of Judaism. Certainly
Epicureanism is practically antithetical to all we believe in: Death is
not an end to existence to be ignored and disregarded. To the contrary:
this world is no more than an entranceway before the Banquet Hall (below,
4:21 www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter4-21.html). The eventuality
of death should not drive us to indulge ourselves, but to spend our lives
preparing for that future grand entrance. (See above, 2:15
www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter2-15b.html).
In addition (as my father of blessed memory once pointed out to me),
scholars have noted that the Talmud's frequent use of this term may have
served as an anti-censorship device. When the Sages had occasion to refer
to Christianity or other contemporary religions (usually in somewhat less
than glowing terms), they would cloak their references by giving the
impression they were referring to some obscure Greek philosophical sect.
(See for example Talmud Chagiga 5b.)
R. Elazar's advice of knowing how to respond to the heretic is significant
on many levels. Although our gut reaction might be one of not caring to
dignify the scoffer with a response -- let him rot in his heresy, we are
told to take his arguments quite seriously. We must be ready with careful
and almost considerate responses. It is worthwhile to examine some of the
reasons behind this.
First of all, we must stand up for the sake of G-d. Don't ignore them --
even if to our minds their positions really do not warrant a response. We
must not give even the most fleeting impression that others' arguments have
any validity -- or that they know how to translate our own Torah better
than we. Even if we know their arguments are contrived, based upon English
mistranslations, or quoted out of context, don't let anyone entertain that
we had no response. Make it clear that we know better.
The Talmud (as well as Jewish history) has some classic rabbinic comebacks
to such confrontations. In Sanhedrin 39a, Rabbi Avohu has a back and forth
with a heretic who asked him clearly absurd questions. (He "proved" from a
verse that G-d is a priest and therefore asked how could He have immersed
Himself after burying Moses being that He is bigger than the world.) R.
Avohu was just as quick to respond with verses quoted equally-ridiculously
out of context. Clearly, both parties knew their entire debate was
ludicrous. However, the rabbi felt it was important that he get the last
word (he did) -- and the Talmud felt their "debate" was significant enough
to be recorded for future generations. Our superiority in all areas of
Torah and theology should be demonstrated conclusively. It started with
us -- and we are still the masters.
Second of all, we respond to heretics for their sakes. We are actually
sincerely interested in showing others the true light of G-d's wisdom. Far
from considering such people infidels to be slain or converted at gunpoint,
we would like very much to reason with them. If (and only if) they doubt
Judaism because they sincerely sought out truth -- and equally-sincerely
reached their erroneous conclusions -- we would be more than happy to
enlighten them with our version of truth. Judaism has high regard for
individuals who ask questions in matters of faith -- even if their answers
have led them along what according to us is the incorrect path. Yisro
tried out every idolatry in the world before realizing the truth of
Judaism (see Mechilta to Exodus 18:11). Yisro really meant it. He was
obsessed with his search for truth - for he knew that if there is a G-d,
He must have provided man with some form of religious expression with
which to serve Him. Eventually -- after an exceedingly long and circuitous
route -- he followed in the footsteps of Abraham, and discovered the true
G-d. For if a person -- even a heretic -- is interested in truth, we have
much to say to him. If, however, he is impervious to open and sincere
discussion and can think only in terms of proving he's "right" and
rescuing our doomed Hebrew souls, then there is little to be gained from
such dialogue.
(I don't mean to be misunderstood. Judaism does not believe in
proselytizing. We have more than enough trouble keeping our own in line
that we are hardly ready (at this point in history) to take on the world.
However, a sincere question always deserves an equally sincere and patient
response.)
Lastly, we must respond to scoffers for our own sakes. We must now and then
fortify ourselves, let ourselves know that agnostics and scoffers have no
real substance to their arguments. A part of us would love to forget about
death. It actually doesn't sound so bad to eat, drink and be merry for our
few remaining miserable years. But we cannot allow ourselves to fall into
the same trap as the agnostics. Don't let ourselves imagine that the
scoffers have something on us - that although their arguments might be less
cogent they embrace far more enticing beliefs. Don't feel that we might
have won the World to Come, but in the process we've sacrificed this world.
For this reason, it is possible to suggest that our mishna concludes as it
does: "And faithful is your Employer that He will pay you the reward for
your labor." The commentator R. Yonah asks, did we not learn above "...do
not be as servants who serve the Master to receive reward" (1:3
www.torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos/chapter1-3.html)? We are generally told
not to focus on heavenly rewards, yet here R. Elazar makes a point of
informing us that we will be rewarded?
I believe the explanation is that at times we must be reminded. And one
such time is when heretics are challenging our faith. Are we tempted to
give their arguments credence? They do have far more relaxed religious
requirements. Hey, Passover is coming! No other religion demands Passover
cleaning! So maybe -- just maybe -- there is something to be said for other
viewpoints and other ways of life.
And so, R. Elazar concluded as he did. G-d does reward us -- and with
true pleasure both in this world and in the next. We will be rewarded in
full, measure for measure. Generally we do not serve G-d in order to
receive reward. But when heretics challenge us, we need that reminder. If
we would think that intellectually Judaism is superior, but that let's
face it: self-serving, Epicureanism is far more pleasurable, then we have
not really gotten the message of Torah. Judaism beats Epicureanism hands
down - spiritually, rationally and physically. Let us never feel we are
sacrificing this world for the next. Hedonists have no idea what pleasure
is. They indulge their bodies, performing acts of selfishness and taking,
until they burn out physically and either get bored with such pleasures or
feel a need to move on to bigger thrills to wring some more excitement out
of life. But they are not giving, they are not growing, and they are not
sensing true satisfaction. They are merely whetting voracious and
insatiable appetites, attempting to placate a gaping, dismal spiritual
void with empty calories and endless frustration. They are living for
nothing -- and deep down they know it. Only we who understand our purpose
in life, who sense our immortality and recognize we are striving towards
it, can sense true happiness and fulfillment both in this world and in the
next.
Pirkei-Avos, Copyright © 2004 by Rabbi Dovid Rosenfeld and Torah.org.